Skip to main content

Specter-Harkin-Kennedy Amendment

Please call your United States Senators TODAY and tell them to
“SUPPORT the SPECTER-HARKIN-KENNEDY AMENDMENT
TO THE 2007 BUDGET RESOLUTION.”
CALL YOUR U.S. SENATORS TODAY TO SUPPORT FUNDING
INCREASES TO CANCER RESEARCH AND PROGRAMS!
This week (the week of March 13th), the Senate is scheduled to vote on the Senate Budget
Resolution, which sets the overall funding allocations for all federal spending for Fiscal Year
2007 (FY 07). As currently drafted, the Senate Budget Resolution CUTS funding for medical
research and public health programs. While this is very serious situation, there is a glimmer of
hope. Sometime THIS WEEK – and possibly as soon as MARCH 14th – the Senate will vote
on the SPECTER-HARKIN-KENNEDY amendment to increase funding for all health and
education programs by $7 billion. The only way to GUARANTEE that cancer research and
programs are not only saved from cuts – but also receive necessary increases in FY 2007 – is for
the Senate to pass the SPECTER-HARKIN-KENNEDY Amendment.
SPECIFIC STEPS TO TAKE:
When the Budget Resolution is considered in the Senate this week, ask your U.S. Senators to
oppose the President's proposed cuts to medical research and public health and support efforts to
increase funding for cancer research and programs. Request that they vote FOR the SPECTERHARKIN-
KENNEDY amendment to increase funding for health and education by $7 billion,
which restores funding for these programs to the FY 05 levels.
• Call the Capitol Hill switchboard at (202) 224-3121, or go to www.senate.gov to find the
Washington, D.C. office numbers for your two U.S. Senators.
• Once connected to each office, ask to speak with the legislative assistant that handles
health care.
• Identify yourself as a voting constituent who cares about cancer research, treatment and
prevention programs. Tell the staff how cancer has touched you or your family.
• Ask that the Senator support the SPECTER-HARKIN-KENNEDY AMENDMENT
TO THE 2007 BUDGET RESOLUTION, and all efforts to increase funding for
Function 550 and cancer research and programs.
• Make it clear that there is no excuse to justify voting against their constituents, the 1.5
million Americans who will be diagnosed with cancer this year, or the 10 million
Americans living with cancer.
• Let the staff know that you will be following the budget process closely, and ask the staff
to keep you up to date on what actions the Senator will take in support of cancer research,
treatment and prevention programs.
BACKGROUND: On the heels of approving the first cuts to the budgets for the National
Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) since 1970 in Fiscal Year
2006 (FY 06), the President has proposed even deeper cuts for the NCI in FY 07. As a result, the
total number of NIH-funded research project grants would drop by 642 (or 2%) below last year’s
level. The President’s budget would cut funding for the NCI by $40 million.
In addition to these cuts in medical research, the President's budget also proposes deep
reductions at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for chronic disease prevention,
quality of life programs, and health promotion. Specifically, the proposed budget cuts nearly
$20 million from chronic disease programs, which include cancer control, prevention, and
survivorship. In fact, under the President's proposal, the CDC Cancer programs, which are
already severely under-funded, would be cut by more the $3 million.
Members of Congress on the respective Appropriations Committee cannot adequately fund
programs in FY 07 if they do not have the authority to spend the money. As we saw last year,
the House and Senate Appropriations Committees can only spend as much money as they are
allocated. That starts with the Congressional Budget Resolution, which sets the spending caps
for the year by "Functions." For health care (including medical research and public health
programs), the critical Function is "550." The bottom line is simple: if the Budget Resolution
CUTS Function 550, the Appropriations bill MUST CUT medical research and public health
programs.
The SPECTER-HARKIN-KENNEDY amendment adds $7 billion for health and education
programs in the budget resolution and restores these functions to the same levels they were at
just two years ago. If we don’t reverse the trend this year, it will only get worse in the future.
The President himself has said, “in order to win the war against cancer we must fund the war
against cancer.” Further, when proclaiming National Cancer Control month last April, the
President said, “aggressive funding will lead scientists to earlier diagnoses and improved
treatments for lung, colorectal and other cancers.”
The budget proposed by the Administration is far from adequate to fulfill this pledge for
“aggressive funding.” In addition, 92 Senators and 280 Representatives signed a letter to the
President in support of providing the resources necessary to end suffering and death from cancer
by 2015.
If Members of Congress truly support cancer research and public health programs and are serious
about their commitment to end suffering and death from cancer, they must support a
Congressional Budget Resolution that increases Function 550 funding over last year's level. If
they support a Budget Resolution that cuts Function 550, they support cutting cancer research,
public health programs at CDC, and quality of life for all Americans who are living with cancer.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Women Using Book To Help People and Animals

By Terri Rimmer Donations from the profits of a new book are going to help people with AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome) and their pets. Following last year’s election, Cathy Conheim and her partner Dr. Donna Brooks were driving to their home, feeling discouraged about current events. There were “dog people” but when they arrived home they discovered a three-month-old kitten living on their property that had been injured badly. Off to the vet they sped with their young charge. An amputation was necessary to save the kitten’s life and they were told that he could no longer be an outdoor cat. They ended up adopting “Henry” and there ensued an incredible journey. Conheim started writing about the cat’s adventures as much for her own healing regarding some bad news politically as for anything else. She sent them to 20 people who sent them on, and today, Henry The Cat has 2,300 emails in ”his” letterbox in the sky. “My cat, Rhett Butler became one of Henry’s teachers and correspond...

Nature Organization Helps With Katrina Effort

By Terri Rimmer Recently 14 Nature Conservancy staff and two volunteers helped out in Mississippi with Hurricane Katrina relief. The country’s wildland fire management resources were mobilized to help with the government’s response. Although their hurricane-related duties didn’t have anything to do with flames their training lent itself well. During the stay in Hattiesburg, MS the team from the Nature Conservancy was able to have housing, transportation, meals, and other needs met. Within the organization the help was orchestrated by Paula Seamon and Sam Lindblom of the agency’s Global Fire Initiative. The team was involved in a variety of activities from clearing timber to helping evacuees. The Initiative helps teach people how fire can be useful and how it can be destructive. According to a press release from nature.org, the Conservancy’s website, the agency and partners have proposed renewed coastal conservation in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. A September release also stated that ...

Making Subsidies Accountable

By Terri Rimmer An award winner and author founded Good Jobs First back in 1998. Greg LeRoy, who wrote No More Candy Store: States and Cities Making Jobs Subsidies Accountable and winner of the 1998 Public Interest Pioneer Award of the Stern Family Fund, has made his organization a national leader. Good Jobs First frequently testifies before state legislatures, conducts workshops and training, and appears in the press. Good Jobs first says that the failure of large companies such as Wal-Mart to provide affordable and comprehensive health coverage to many of their employees has been a subject of growing controversy – all the more so because large numbers of those workers not insured on the job are turning instead to government programs such as Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). According to their website, goodjobsfirst.org, Wal-Mart has received more than $1 billion in economic development subsidies from state and local governments across the country. The...